Page 1 of 1

Izamal City, Yucatan, Mexico September 2012

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:10 pm
by 360Texas
We use our:
Canon 5d mounted landscape orientation
Sigma 8mm 180° Fisheye lens and a NN R1 tilted up 5°
manual f/8, set to hyperfocal distance at .9 feet
levelled monopod
4 raw images converted PSCS6 ACR to 16bit TIF and stitched PTgui 16bit.
Pano2vr 4b2 and 4b3.

I started this HTML5//Flash project just after our return from Mexico last September 2012. I first was using Pano2vr 4b2 and having difficulty with the viewing parameters as the "N" North selection was not working. Next moved to Pano2vr 4b3 and the North arrow had been fixed... proceed building the 18 pano tour.

Experienced difficulties using the HTML5 'flash fallback features and filename conventions. After 3 weeks of trial and error attempts decided to render the project as a FLASH only project with the hopes of returning to the project and resolve the HTML5 issues. I needed to get this Mexico trip project published.

For now... lets just enjoy the Flash project.

http://360texas.com/services/izamalcity/

Re: Izamal City, Yucatan, Mexico September 2012

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:10 pm
by 360Texas
:D Today, we finished converting and testing this project to use HTML5 + Flash.

Now it should work with MAC and PC's.

http://360texas.com/services/izamalcity/

YEAH !!

Re: Izamal City, Yucatan, Mexico September 2012

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:37 pm
by nigbo
Great panoramas. Clear and high quality photos.

One thing I miss: there is no gyroscope option to move it on an ipad by turning around yourself. Why don't you just include that option in your html5 versions? It is a great feature of pano2vr.

H.

Re: Izamal City, Yucatan, Mexico September 2012

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:08 am
by 360Texas
Yes, well gyroscope used to be rather an interesting feature.

Kept getting forum comments from folks could not figure out when viewing our panoramas they always opened showing the dirt or concrete bottom of our panoramas. Must have been a bug in the new Pan2vr Ver 4. We thought about that for a while. Almost turned in a BUG REPORT. Did some html code reviews, rebuilding them over and over. We knew we assembled our panoramas correctly.

Then we just removed that feature from our panoramas. Simple as that.

LOLLL Seemed that the folks viewing our panorama always had their iPad laying on a table.
Y'all know that they just should not be doing that. Go figure.